How about the CS75's four-wheel drive? ——Hot topics and in-depth analysis across the Internet
Recently, the four-wheel drive performance of the Changan CS75 series has become a hot topic on automotive forums and social platforms. As one of the representative models of domestic SUVs, is the four-wheel drive version of the CS75 worth buying? This article combines the hot discussion content of the entire network in the past 10 days and conducts a structured analysis from the perspectives of performance, configuration, user feedback, etc.
1. Comparison of core parameters of CS75 four-wheel drive system
| Project | CS75 PLUS four-wheel drive version | CS75 Honor Edition 4WD |
|---|---|---|
| Drive form | Real-time four-wheel drive (BorgWarner system) | Timely four-wheel drive (same brand) |
| Engine power | 233 horsepower/360N·m | 188 horsepower/300N·m |
| Off-road mode | Snow/Mud/Sand | Snow/Mud |
| ground clearance | 190mm | 185mm |
2. Analysis of hot topics on the entire network
1.Performance:Most users recognized its four-wheel drive capability in its urban SUV positioning, especially its high rating in terms of stability in rain and snow weather (a favorable rating of 87% in a car forum).
2.Fuel consumption controversy:The fuel consumption of the four-wheel drive version is about 1.2L/100km higher than that of the two-wheel drive version. The actual measured data is as follows:
| road conditions | Fuel consumption of two-wheel drive version | Four-wheel drive version fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|
| city road | 8.5L | 9.7L |
| highway | 7.2L | 8.3L |
3.Configuration differences:The four-wheel drive version comes standard with steep hill descent control and HDC hill control systems, but some users reported the lack of a differential lock (compare to the Haval H6 four-wheel drive version).
3. Real experience reports from car owners
According to 135 car owner feedback collected by a vertical platform:
| Evaluation dimension | Satisfaction | Typical comments |
|---|---|---|
| Ability to get out of trouble | 78% | "It's adequate for light off-roading, but the cross-axle test is a bit difficult" |
| road handling | 92% | "Curving stability is significantly better than the two-wheel drive version" |
| Cost-effectiveness | 65% | "50,000 cheaper than the joint venture brand, but there are trade-offs in configuration" |
4. Horizontal comparison of competing products
Comparison with popular models of the same level (price range 150,000-200,000):
| car model | Four wheel drive type | Maximum torque | differential lock |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changan CS75 PLUS | timely four-wheel drive | 360N·m | None |
| Haval H6 four-wheel drive | timely four-wheel drive | 385N·m | Optional |
| Geely Boyue PRO | full-time four-wheel drive | 300N·m | None |
5. Purchase suggestions
1.Suitable for the crowd:Users in snowy northern areas and home users who occasionally go off-road.
2.Note when purchasing:The 2023 four-wheel drive version has a new torque vectoring function, and it is recommended to give priority to the new model.
3.Market conditions:The current terminal discount is about 15,000 yuan (data comes from dealer quotations in June).
Summary:The four-wheel drive system of the CS75 has a balanced performance among 150,000-class SUVs. Although it is not a hardcore off-road positioning, it is perfectly suitable for urban + light off-road usage scenarios. It has performed well in the recent #cs75 off-road challenge topic on Douyin, and it is worthy of consideration by users with limited budget who just need four-wheel drive.
check the details
check the details
en
